In a
desperate (and cynical) attempt to buy last minute votes at the presidential
debates last night, presidential hopeful Mitt Romney proposed an across the
board income tax cut of 20% for everyone. To sweeten the deal, he said he would
balance the cuts by eliminating deductions and loopholes so there would be no
net loss in federal revenues.
What could
be fairer or more generous?
20% might
seem like a lot, and it is if you are rich. Even after the loopholes are
closed, it is estimated that the average wealthy American will still save $250,000
per year under Romney’s plan. Thus, Romney’s tax plan will give wealthy Americans
a gift worth more than quadruple the yearly income of most Americans.
For most of
us, however, Romney’s tax cut would provide little relief and, for many of us,
it will actually translate into higher taxes, not lower. This is because his
plan includes ending all deductions over $17,000. For working class or middle
class homeowners in California, who have mortgages of $300,000 or more, the
state income tax and mortgage interest deductions, alone, come to more than
$17,000. Thus, many moderate income residents would have to pay more in taxes,
even with the 25% tax cut, because they will lose so many of the deductions
they had previously used to lower their tax liability.
Another
problem with the Romney plan is that it is not possible to entirely balance out
the cost of the tax cuts by closing loopholes and deductions. Without any offsets, it
is estimated that it would add another $5 trillion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years and
this is in addition to the $5 trillion the Bush tax cuts are currently adding. Since
the Romney plan would be layered on top of the Bush tax cuts, which will also
continue for the next ten years, the total bill under Romney’s plan would be far more than $5 trillion, even with the offsets. Obama’s plan, which is essentially just an extension of the Bush
tax cuts just for middle-income Americans, would increase the deficit by $4
trillion over this same time period.
No comments:
Post a Comment