United
Teachers of Los Angeles (UTLA) just had one of its most contested elections
ever for its decision-making body, the House of Representatives. 396 candidates fought for 209
positions, with 100 seats taken by rookie representatives, according to the LA Times. Many of
these new delegates were sponsored by outside groups, like Educators 4 Excellence and Teach Plus. Another sponsoring
organization, Teachers for a New Unionism, is headed by Mike Stryer, former activist with
NewTLA, a
conservative opposition movement that formed within UTLA a few years ago.
Each of
these groups receives funding from free market education reform nonprofits, including
the Gates Foundation and each wants to make the union focus more on the “interests
of students” (weakening teachers’ job protections and working conditions). They
have also been strong backers of Value Added evaluations and abolishing or
weakening seniority.
On the one
hand, serious union activists and teachers should be concerned that corporate
money is being used to undermine their organizing efforts. On the other hand,
this really isn’t anything new. Employers routinely interfere in organizing
efforts, harass organizers, punish or fire employees who engage in union
activities, and bombard them with misinformation about unions. The bosses just
hadn’t been so effective at fielding their own candidates in union elections.
At the same
time, UTLA veterans and other union bureaucrats and dinosaurs should consider
why so many young teachers are either disillusioned with their unions or
allying themselves with corporate Ed Deformers. A union that effectively fights
for the interests of all their members should have no problem winning younger
teachers over to their side or convincing them of the naiveté and
self-destructiveness of these corporate alliances. It is true that UTLA must
counter an effective anti-union propaganda machine. However, UTLA, like most
other teachers unions, has contributed to its own negative image by making so
many compromises with the enemy while doing little to support young teachers, who
are often the first to go during layoffs.
No comments:
Post a Comment